Nordace Windsor vs. Arcido Saxon

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Nordace Windsor

Front facing view of the Nordace Windsor
Capacity22 L
Weight1.14 kg
Dimensions46×29×18 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$135

Feature by feature

Nordace WindsorFeatureArcido Saxon
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
Y Passport N
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
900D POLYESTER WITH PU LAYERKodra Nylon

Arcido Saxon

Front facing view of the Arcido Saxon
Capacity25 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions45×33×20 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$119

Key differences between the Nordace Windsor and Arcido Saxon

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 177 accept both. 1 accept only the Nordace Windsor, and 2 accept only the Arcido Saxon.

Only the Nordace Windsor fits

Air Niugini.

Only the Arcido Saxon fits

Air Tahiti, Gulf Air.

Nordace Windsor vs. Arcido Saxon: which should you pack?

The Arcido Saxon carries 3L more than the Nordace Windsor (22L vs. 25L), while the Arcido Saxon is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.14kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Arcido Saxon fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Saxon; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Saxon is the better call.