L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack vs. Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack

Front facing view of the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack
Capacity33 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions46×32×17 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$140

Feature by feature

L.L.Bean Continental RucksackFeatureRemote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack
Storage
4 Compression 4
None Expanded Capacity 36L
0 Opening 2
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
hideable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop 16in
5 Main Compartments 6
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600-denier, bluesign®-approved recycled polyesterChallenge Outdoor EPX600

Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack

Capacity31 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×29×20 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$400

Key differences between the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack and Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack

Both have: compression straps, passport pocket, backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 11 accept only the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack, and 0 accept only the Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack.

Only the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack fits

American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack vs. Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack: which should you pack?

The L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack carries 2L more than the Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack (33L vs. 31L), while the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack is the lighter pack at 1.1kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack; if you want to travel lighter, the L.L.Bean Continental Rucksack is the better call.