OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3 vs. Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3

Front facing view of the OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3
Capacity23 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions49×35×19 cm
Airline fit90%
Price$250

Feature by feature

OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3FeaturePatagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 3
top Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
5 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
800x600D lightweight waterproof nylon-polyester blend600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 00-denier 100% recycled polyester

Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.52 kg
Dimensions49×27×13 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$101

Key differences between the OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3 and Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 171 accept both. 0 accept only the OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3, and 3 accept only the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L.

Only the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L fits

Air Niugini, Cayman Airways, Great Lakes Airlines.

OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3 vs. Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L carries 5L more than the OpposeThis Invisible Backpack 3 (23L vs. 28L), while the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L is the lighter pack at 0.52kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L is the better call.