Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L vs. Exped Mountain Pro 40

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L
Capacity55 L
Weight1.28 kg
Dimensions67×32×20 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$219

Feature by feature

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55LFeatureExped Mountain Pro 40
Storage
removable Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 0-denier 100% nylon ripstop420 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 3'000 mm water column

Exped Mountain Pro 40

Front facing view of the Exped Mountain Pro 40
Capacity42 L
Weight1.39 kg
Dimensions62×32×26 cm
Airline fit2%
Price$190

Key differences between the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L and Exped Mountain Pro 40

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L, and 1 accept only the Exped Mountain Pro 40.

Only the Exped Mountain Pro 40 fits

Island Air.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L vs. Exped Mountain Pro 40: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L carries 13L more than the Exped Mountain Pro 40 (55L vs. 42L), while the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L is the lighter pack at 1.28kg (vs. 1.39kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Exped Mountain Pro 40 fits 2% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L is the better call.