Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L vs. HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L
Capacity55 L
Weight1.28 kg
Dimensions67×32×20 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$219

Feature by feature

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55LFeatureHEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+
Storage
removable Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 0-denier 100% nylon ripstop840 D Ballistic Nylon, PU coated 1680 D Ballistic Nylon, PU coated

HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+

Front facing view of the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+
Capacity45 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions63×33×29 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$199

Key differences between the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L and HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L vs. HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L carries 10L more than the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+ (55L vs. 45L), while the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L is the lighter pack at 1.28kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L is the better call.