Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L vs. Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L

Front facing view of the Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L
Capacity36 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions45×31×20 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$100

Feature by feature

Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36LFeatureFjallraven Kanken 16L
Storage
4 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
front Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop N
2 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600 Denier PolyesterVinylon F: 100% vinylal

Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Kanken 16L
Capacity16 L
Weight0.3 kg
Dimensions36×28×12 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$90

Key differences between the Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L and Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. 0 accept only the Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L, and 8 accept only the Fjallraven Kanken 16L.

Only the Fjallraven Kanken 16L fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L vs. Fjallraven Kanken 16L: which should you pack?

The Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L carries 20L more than the Fjallraven Kanken 16L (36L vs. 16L), while the Fjallraven Kanken 16L is the lighter pack at 0.3kg (vs. 0.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Kanken 16L fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cabin Zero Classic Cabin Backpack 36L; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Kanken 16L is the better call.