Exped Transit 30 vs. Fjallraven Vardag 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Transit 30

Front facing view of the Exped Transit 30
Capacity30 L
Weight0.675 kg
Dimensions55×28×20 cm
Airline fit87%
Price$80

Feature by feature

Exped Transit 30FeatureFjallraven Vardag 25
Storage
Y Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
removable Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water columnG-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton

Fjallraven Vardag 25

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Vardag 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.48 kg
Dimensions43×31×14.5 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$80

Key differences between the Exped Transit 30 and Fjallraven Vardag 25

Both have: sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 1 accept only the Exped Transit 30, and 16 accept only the Fjallraven Vardag 25.

Only the Exped Transit 30 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Fjallraven Vardag 25 fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Exped Transit 30 vs. Fjallraven Vardag 25: which should you pack?

The Exped Transit 30 carries 5L more than the Fjallraven Vardag 25 (30L vs. 25L), while the Fjallraven Vardag 25 is the lighter pack at 0.48kg (vs. 0.675kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Vardag 25 fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Transit 30; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Vardag 25 is the better call.