Timbuk2 Blink vs. Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Timbuk2 Blink

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Blink
Capacity24 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions54×28×10 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$140

Feature by feature

Timbuk2 BlinkFeatureCabin Zero Gap Year 28L
Storage
Y Compression 2
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 1
front Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
Water Bottle Holder 1, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600D polyester

Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L

Front facing view of the Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions39×30×20 cm
Airline fit98%
Price$110

Key differences between the Timbuk2 Blink and Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 1 accept only the Timbuk2 Blink, and 20 accept only the Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L.

Only the Timbuk2 Blink fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Spring Airlines, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, WestJet, Wizz Air.

Timbuk2 Blink vs. Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L: which should you pack?

The Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L carries 4L more than the Timbuk2 Blink (24L vs. 28L), while the Timbuk2 Blink is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 0.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L fits 98% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cabin Zero Gap Year 28L; if you want to travel lighter, the Timbuk2 Blink is the better call.