Exped Metro 20 vs. Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Metro 20

Front facing view of the Exped Metro 20
Capacity20 L
Weight0.72 kg
Dimensions50×28×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$99

Feature by feature

Exped Metro 20FeatureFjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600 D ripstop polyester, PU coated, 1'200 mm water columnG-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton

Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium
Capacity20 L
Weight0.96 kg
Dimensions44×28×13 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$180

Key differences between the Exped Metro 20 and Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 0 accept only the Exped Metro 20, and 7 accept only the Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium.

Only the Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Exped Metro 20 vs. Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium: which should you pack?

The Exped Metro 20 carries the same capacity as the Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium (20L vs. 20L), while the Exped Metro 20 is the lighter pack at 0.72kg (vs. 0.96kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Metro 20; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Metro 20 is the better call.