KS Ultralight Tao vs. Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

KS Ultralight Tao

Front facing view of the KS Ultralight Tao
Capacity35 L
Weight0.3 kg
Dimensions71×30×18 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$150

Feature by feature

KS Ultralight TaoFeaturePatagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L
Storage
N Compression removable
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
top Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop N
2 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
X-pac VX 07YKK "waterproof zip"420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 0-denier 100% nylon ripstop

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L
Capacity55 L
Weight1.28 kg
Dimensions67×32×20 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$219

Key differences between the KS Ultralight Tao and Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

KS Ultralight Tao vs. Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L carries 20L more than the KS Ultralight Tao (35L vs. 55L), while the KS Ultralight Tao is the lighter pack at 0.3kg (vs. 1.28kg). For carry-on flexibility, the KS Ultralight Tao fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 55L; if you want to travel lighter, the KS Ultralight Tao is the better call.