Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L vs. DSPTCH Utility Ruck

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L
Capacity30 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions49×31×22 cm
Airline fit72%
Price$99

Feature by feature

Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30LFeatureDSPTCH Utility Ruck
Storage
N Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester410D Nylon Packcloth with DWR coating

DSPTCH Utility Ruck

Front facing view of the DSPTCH Utility Ruck
Capacity28 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions44×31×21 cm
Airline fit76%
Price$204

Key differences between the Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L and DSPTCH Utility Ruck

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 137 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L, and 6 accept only the DSPTCH Utility Ruck.

Only the DSPTCH Utility Ruck fits

American Eagle, Gulf Air, Liat Airlines, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L vs. DSPTCH Utility Ruck: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L carries 2L more than the DSPTCH Utility Ruck (30L vs. 28L), while the Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the DSPTCH Utility Ruck fits 76% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Chacabuco Backpack 30L is the better call.