Exped Torrent 30 vs. Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Torrent 30

Front facing view of the Exped Torrent 30
Capacity30 L
Weight1.13 kg
Dimensions55×27×20 cm
Airline fit87%

Feature by feature

Exped Torrent 30FeatureTom Bihn Aeronaut 30L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 0
N Passport side
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
removable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 5
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
840 D Oxford nylon, TPU film laminate, >10'000 mm water column1050 denier ballistic nylon OR ultralight 400d Halcyon/420d nylon ripstop 200 denier Halcyon/nylon ripstop fabric lining

Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L

Front facing view of the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L
Capacity30 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions50×32×20 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$330

Key differences between the Exped Torrent 30 and Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L

Both have: hip belt, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 1 accept only the Exped Torrent 30, and 9 accept only the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L.

Only the Exped Torrent 30 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, WestJet.

Exped Torrent 30 vs. Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L: which should you pack?

The Exped Torrent 30 carries the same capacity as the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L (30L vs. 30L), while the Exped Torrent 30 is the lighter pack at 1.13kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Torrent 30; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Torrent 30 is the better call.