Thule EnRoute vs. Cotopaxi Allpa 26

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Thule EnRoute

Front facing view of the Thule EnRoute
Capacity23 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions47×30×22 cm
Airline fit74%
Price$120

Feature by feature

Thule EnRouteFeatureCotopaxi Allpa 26
Storage
2 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
top Passport front
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
16in Laptop 16in
3 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
N Water Resistant N
Material
100% recycled polyester 450D TPU

Cotopaxi Allpa 26

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 26
Capacity26 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions52×33×23 cm
Airline fit70%
Price$145

Key differences between the Thule EnRoute and Cotopaxi Allpa 26

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 132 accept both. 7 accept only the Thule EnRoute, and 0 accept only the Cotopaxi Allpa 26.

Only the Thule EnRoute fits

Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia.

Thule EnRoute vs. Cotopaxi Allpa 26: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Allpa 26 carries 3L more than the Thule EnRoute (23L vs. 26L), while the Thule EnRoute is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Thule EnRoute fits 74% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Allpa 26; if you want to travel lighter, the Thule EnRoute is the better call.