Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack vs. Waymark Dark Sky

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack

Front facing view of the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack
Capacity21 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions45×34×19 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$125

Feature by feature

Nomatic McKinnon Cube PackFeatureWaymark Dark Sky
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
NylonRecycled RBC350 Ripstop Polyester, RBC600, RBC200 fabrics

Waymark Dark Sky

Front facing view of the Waymark Dark Sky
Capacity16 L
Weight0.4 kg
Dimensions41×27×14 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$115

Key differences between the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack and Waymark Dark Sky

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. 0 accept only the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack, and 2 accept only the Waymark Dark Sky.

Only the Waymark Dark Sky fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines.

Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack vs. Waymark Dark Sky: which should you pack?

The Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack carries 5L more than the Waymark Dark Sky (21L vs. 16L), while the Waymark Dark Sky is the lighter pack at 0.4kg (vs. 0.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Waymark Dark Sky fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack; if you want to travel lighter, the Waymark Dark Sky is the better call.