Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack vs. Exped Transit 30

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack

Front facing view of the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack
Capacity21 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions45×34×19 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$125

Feature by feature

Nomatic McKinnon Cube PackFeatureExped Transit 30
Storage
N Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack removable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Nylon840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column

Exped Transit 30

Front facing view of the Exped Transit 30
Capacity30 L
Weight0.675 kg
Dimensions55×28×20 cm
Airline fit87%
Price$80

Key differences between the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack and Exped Transit 30

Both have: sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 16 accept only the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack, and 1 accept only the Exped Transit 30.

Only the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Only the Exped Transit 30 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack vs. Exped Transit 30: which should you pack?

The Exped Transit 30 carries 9L more than the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack (21L vs. 30L), while the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack is the lighter pack at 0.6kg (vs. 0.675kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Transit 30; if you want to travel lighter, the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack is the better call.