Kifaru Checkpoint vs. Thule EnRoute

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Kifaru Checkpoint

Front facing view of the Kifaru Checkpoint
Capacity28 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions51×28×23 cm
Airline fit71%
Price$350

Feature by feature

Kifaru CheckpointFeatureThule EnRoute
Storage
N Compression 2
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 0
top Passport top
N Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
16in Laptop 16in
3 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
N Water Resistant N
Material
500D Cordura

Thule EnRoute

Front facing view of the Thule EnRoute
Capacity23 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions47×30×22 cm
Airline fit74%
Price$120

Key differences between the Kifaru Checkpoint and Thule EnRoute

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 134 accept both. 1 accept only the Kifaru Checkpoint, and 5 accept only the Thule EnRoute.

Only the Kifaru Checkpoint fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Thule EnRoute fits

Etihad Airways, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Kifaru Checkpoint vs. Thule EnRoute: which should you pack?

The Kifaru Checkpoint carries 5L more than the Thule EnRoute (28L vs. 23L), while the Thule EnRoute is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Thule EnRoute fits 74% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Kifaru Checkpoint; if you want to travel lighter, the Thule EnRoute is the better call.