Exped Torrent 20 vs. Exped Cascade 20

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Torrent 20

Front facing view of the Exped Torrent 20
Capacity20 L
Weight0.98 kg
Dimensions50×27×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$149

Feature by feature

Exped Torrent 20FeatureExped Cascade 20
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
13in Laptop 13in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
840 D Oxford nylon, TPU film laminate, >10'000 mm water column420 D Oxford nylon, TPU film laminate, >10'000 mm water column

Exped Cascade 20

Front facing view of the Exped Cascade 20
Capacity20 L
Weight0.84 kg
Dimensions47×27×16 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$129

Key differences between the Exped Torrent 20 and Exped Cascade 20

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 0 accept only the Exped Torrent 20, and 2 accept only the Exped Cascade 20.

Only the Exped Cascade 20 fits

Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Exped Torrent 20 vs. Exped Cascade 20: which should you pack?

The Exped Torrent 20 carries the same capacity as the Exped Cascade 20 (20L vs. 20L), while the Exped Cascade 20 is the lighter pack at 0.84kg (vs. 0.98kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Exped Cascade 20 fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Torrent 20; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Cascade 20 is the better call.