Nomatic Travel Backpack vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Nomatic Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the Nomatic Travel Backpack
Capacity20 L
Weight1.8 kg
Dimensions47×30×13 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$330

Feature by feature

Nomatic Travel BackpackFeatureTimbuk2 Scheme
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
back Passport side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 6
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Waterproof tarpaulin

Timbuk2 Scheme

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme
Capacity21 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions43×30×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$180

Key differences between the Nomatic Travel Backpack and Timbuk2 Scheme

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 175 accept both. 0 accept only the Nomatic Travel Backpack, and 5 accept only the Timbuk2 Scheme.

Only the Timbuk2 Scheme fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska.

Nomatic Travel Backpack vs. Timbuk2 Scheme: which should you pack?

The Timbuk2 Scheme carries 1L more than the Nomatic Travel Backpack (20L vs. 21L), while the Timbuk2 Scheme is the lighter pack at 1.2kg (vs. 1.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Timbuk2 Scheme fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Timbuk2 Scheme; if you want to travel lighter, the Timbuk2 Scheme is the better call.