Nomatic Travel Backpack vs. Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Nomatic Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the Nomatic Travel Backpack
Capacity20 L
Weight1.8 kg
Dimensions47×30×13 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$330

Feature by feature

Nomatic Travel BackpackFeaturePatagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
back Passport N
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Waterproof tarpaulin8.7-oz 300-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop with a postindustrial recycled TPU-film laminate

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Capacity22 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Key differences between the Nomatic Travel Backpack and Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 175 accept both. 0 accept only the Nomatic Travel Backpack, and 3 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L.

Only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits

American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska.

Nomatic Travel Backpack vs. Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L carries 2L more than the Nomatic Travel Backpack (20L vs. 22L), while the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the better call.