Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus vs. Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1 kg |
| Dimensions | 52×30×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 71% |
| Price | $179 |
Feature by feature
| Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus | Feature | Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Venture-weave polyester and leather | Custom VX21 X-Pac material |
Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 0.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 46×28×18 cm |
| Airline fit | 95% |
| Price | $170 |
Key differences between the Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus and Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack
- Passport pocket: Yes on the Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus; No on the Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus; 1 on the Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack.
Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 134 accept both. 0 accept only the Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus, and 45 accept only the Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack.
Only the Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack fits
Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, Volotea, Xiamen.
When you’re looking at mid-sized carry-on backpacks like the Bellroy Classic Backpack Plus and the Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack, the little things make a big difference. They’re neck-and-neck in some ways—both offer 22 liters of storage capacity and accommodate 15 inch laptops. But there are areas where they diverge.
Let’s break down the main contrasts:
- Size: The Bellroy Classic is larger (21" tall, 30" wide, 52" deep) compared to the Rennen X-Pac Daypack (18” tall, 28" wide, 46" deep).
- Weight: The Bellroy comes in slightly heavier (1 lb) while the Rennen weighs a mere 0.9 pounds.
- Compatibility: The Rennen packs a punch with compatibility for 99% of airlines while the Bellroy limits itself at 65%.
- Material: The Bellroy is crafted from Venture-weave polyester and leather, while the Rennen scores with its use of Custom VX21 X-Pac material.
- Style and Reviewer Ratings: Both backpacks are commended for their style and construction. The Rennen is lauded for its durability and versatility, while reviewers rave about Bellroy's craftsmanship, sleek design and superior organization.
Now, let’s dig deeper. The Bellroy Classic is known for its exquisitely designed compartments, thanks to its venture-weave polyester and leather construction. This bag is recommended for both students and professionals, with high praises from reviewers for its fine workmanship and practical design. A favorite among many users is the internal organization, allowing you to segregate items neatly and securely during travel.
On the other hand, the Boundary Supply Rennen X-Pac Daypack features a strong and weather-resistant Custom VX21 X-Pac fabric, which is designed to resist tearing and provide waterproofing. Users love its minimalist design and the ease of attaching compatible accessories to the bag. Considered as a straightforward option and a reliable bag for day-to-day life, this daypack serves the user well without much fuss. It's also noted to be a more affordable choice than many of its competitors, making it appealing for the practical and budget-conscious consumer. In short, both backpacks have their respective merits but it's up to you to decide which suits your carry requirement best.