Outlander Packable Backpack vs. Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Outlander Packable Backpack

Front facing view of the Outlander Packable Backpack
Capacity20 L
Weight0.5 kg
Dimensions43×27×18 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$20

Feature by feature

Outlander Packable BackpackFeatureFjallraven Kanken 16L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 1
front Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
N Laptop N
3 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
N Water Resistant Y
Material
Vinylon F: 100% vinylal

Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Kanken 16L
Capacity16 L
Weight0.3 kg
Dimensions36×28×12 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$90

Key differences between the Outlander Packable Backpack and Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water bottle pockets.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 181 accept both. 0 accept only the Outlander Packable Backpack, and 6 accept only the Fjallraven Kanken 16L.

Only the Fjallraven Kanken 16L fits

LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Outlander Packable Backpack vs. Fjallraven Kanken 16L: which should you pack?

The Outlander Packable Backpack carries 4L more than the Fjallraven Kanken 16L (20L vs. 16L), while the Fjallraven Kanken 16L is the lighter pack at 0.3kg (vs. 0.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Kanken 16L fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Outlander Packable Backpack; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Kanken 16L is the better call.