Arcido Oxna vs. Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Oxna

Front facing view of the Arcido Oxna
Capacity28 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions50×32×20 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$209

Feature by feature

Arcido OxnaFeaturePatagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 3
Y Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Kodra Nylon600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 00-denier 100% recycled polyester

Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.52 kg
Dimensions49×27×13 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$101

Key differences between the Arcido Oxna and Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L

Both have: sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 0 accept only the Arcido Oxna, and 2 accept only the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L.

Only the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines.

Arcido Oxna vs. Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L: which should you pack?

The Arcido Oxna carries the same capacity as the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L (28L vs. 28L), while the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L is the lighter pack at 0.52kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Oxna; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L is the better call.