Arcido Oxna vs. Nomatic Travel Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Oxna

Front facing view of the Arcido Oxna
Capacity28 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions50×32×20 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$209

Feature by feature

Arcido OxnaFeatureNomatic Travel Pack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
Y Passport back
N Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 5
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Kodra NylonWaterproof tarpaulin

Nomatic Travel Pack

Front facing view of the Nomatic Travel Pack
Capacity20 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions47×30×15 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$300

Key differences between the Arcido Oxna and Nomatic Travel Pack

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 0 accept only the Arcido Oxna, and 3 accept only the Nomatic Travel Pack.

Only the Nomatic Travel Pack fits

Air Niugini, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Arcido Oxna vs. Nomatic Travel Pack: which should you pack?

The Arcido Oxna carries 8L more than the Nomatic Travel Pack (28L vs. 20L), while the Arcido Oxna is the lighter pack at 1.1kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Nomatic Travel Pack fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Oxna; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Oxna is the better call.