Arcido Oxna vs. Jansport Field Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Oxna

Front facing view of the Arcido Oxna
Capacity28 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions50×32×20 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$209

Feature by feature

Arcido OxnaFeatureJansport Field Pack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 4
Y Passport Y
N Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Kodra Nylon

Jansport Field Pack

Front facing view of the Jansport Field Pack
Capacity28 L
Weight0.56 kg
Dimensions43×31×13 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$55

Key differences between the Arcido Oxna and Jansport Field Pack

Both have: passport pocket, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 0 accept only the Arcido Oxna, and 7 accept only the Jansport Field Pack.

Only the Jansport Field Pack fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Arcido Oxna vs. Jansport Field Pack: which should you pack?

The Arcido Oxna carries the same capacity as the Jansport Field Pack (28L vs. 28L), while the Jansport Field Pack is the lighter pack at 0.56kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Jansport Field Pack fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Oxna; if you want to travel lighter, the Jansport Field Pack is the better call.