KS Ultralight KS27 vs. Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

KS Ultralight KS27

Front facing view of the KS Ultralight KS27
Capacity27 L
Weight0.3 kg
Dimensions55×28×16 cm
Airline fit87%
Price$130

Feature by feature

KS Ultralight KS27FeatureTom Bihn Aeronaut 30L
Storage
2 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
top Passport side
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop N
2 Main Compartments 5
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
X-pac VX 07 YKK "waterproof zip"1050 denier ballistic nylon OR ultralight 400d Halcyon/420d nylon ripstop 200 denier Halcyon/nylon ripstop fabric lining

Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L

Front facing view of the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L
Capacity30 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions50×32×20 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$330

Key differences between the KS Ultralight KS27 and Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L

Both have: hip belt, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 1 accept only the KS Ultralight KS27, and 9 accept only the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L.

Only the KS Ultralight KS27 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, WestJet.

KS Ultralight KS27 vs. Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L: which should you pack?

The Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L carries 3L more than the KS Ultralight KS27 (27L vs. 30L), while the KS Ultralight KS27 is the lighter pack at 0.3kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Tom Bihn Aeronaut 30L; if you want to travel lighter, the KS Ultralight KS27 is the better call.