Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L vs. Fjallraven Raven 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L
Capacity22 L
Weight0.48 kg
Dimensions49×31×13 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$89

Feature by feature

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22LFeatureFjallraven Raven 28
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 200-denier 100% recycled polyesterG-1000 HeavyDuty

Fjallraven Raven 28

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Raven 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1 kg
Dimensions47×36×15 cm
Airline fit84%
Price$120

Key differences between the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L and Fjallraven Raven 28

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 158 accept both. 14 accept only the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L, and 0 accept only the Fjallraven Raven 28.

Only the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air France, Air India, Air Mauritius, Boliviana de Aviacion, Cayman Airways, flybe, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Sky Airlines.

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L vs. Fjallraven Raven 28: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Raven 28 carries 6L more than the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L (22L vs. 28L), while the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L is the lighter pack at 0.48kg (vs. 1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Raven 28; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L is the better call.