Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L vs. Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L
Capacity22 L
Weight0.48 kg
Dimensions49×31×13 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$89

Feature by feature

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22LFeatureKathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant N
Material
600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester600D Polyester

Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L

Front facing view of the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions50×31×20 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$80

Key differences between the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L and Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L vs. Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L: which should you pack?

The Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L carries 3L more than the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L (22L vs. 25L), while the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L is the lighter pack at 0.48kg (vs. 0.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 25L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L is the better call.