Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L vs. STM Trilogy

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L
Capacity22 L
Weight0.48 kg
Dimensions49×31×13 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$89

Feature by feature

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22LFeatureSTM Trilogy
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester100% polyester

STM Trilogy

by Stm
Front facing view of the STM Trilogy
Capacity24 L
Weight0.64 kg
Dimensions46×30×16 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$80

Key differences between the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L and STM Trilogy

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L, and 6 accept only the STM Trilogy.

Only the STM Trilogy fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L vs. STM Trilogy: which should you pack?

The STM Trilogy carries 2L more than the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L (22L vs. 24L), while the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L is the lighter pack at 0.48kg (vs. 0.64kg). For carry-on flexibility, the STM Trilogy fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the STM Trilogy; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Arbor Zip Pack 22L is the better call.