Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 vs. Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55

Front facing view of the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55
Capacity55 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions73×36×23 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$220

Feature by feature

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55FeatureEagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 17in
1 Main Compartments 1
Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
removable Rain-fly Y
2 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420HD Nylon Packcloth450D Geo Ripstop, Bi-Tech™, 600D Helix™ Poly

Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit

Front facing view of the Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit
Capacity68 L
Weight2.33 kg
Dimensions66×35×31 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$229

Key differences between the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 and Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 vs. Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit: which should you pack?

The Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit carries 13L more than the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 (55L vs. 68L), while the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 is the lighter pack at 1.9kg (vs. 2.33kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Eagle Creek Global Companion 65L Women's Fit; if you want to travel lighter, the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 is the better call.