Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 vs. Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55

Front facing view of the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55
Capacity55 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions73×36×23 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$220

Feature by feature

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55FeaturePatagonia Altvia Pack 36L
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Organizer
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
removable Rain-fly Y
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420HD Nylon Packcloth140-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 210-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop

Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L
Capacity36 L
Weight0.992 kg
Dimensions60×31×27 cm
Airline fit3%
Price$179

Key differences between the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 and Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55, and 5 accept only the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L.

Only the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L fits

Adria Airways, Air New Zealand, Island Air, Sun Country, Virgin America.

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 vs. Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L: which should you pack?

The Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 carries 19L more than the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L (55L vs. 36L), while the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L is the lighter pack at 0.992kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L fits 3% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Altvia Pack 36L is the better call.