Cotopaxi Allpa 28 vs. Thule Subterra 34L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cotopaxi Allpa 28

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1 kg
Dimensions48×30×23 cm
Airline fit73%
Price$200

Feature by feature

Cotopaxi Allpa 28FeatureThule Subterra 34L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 2
side Passport side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
hideable Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1, side Water Bottle Holder 1, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon800D nylon

Thule Subterra 34L

Front facing view of the Thule Subterra 34L
Capacity34 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions52×31×23 cm
Airline fit70%
Price$180

Key differences between the Cotopaxi Allpa 28 and Thule Subterra 34L

Both have: passport pocket, luggage passthrough, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 132 accept both. 6 accept only the Cotopaxi Allpa 28, and 0 accept only the Thule Subterra 34L.

Only the Cotopaxi Allpa 28 fits

Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia.

Cotopaxi Allpa 28 vs. Thule Subterra 34L: which should you pack?

The Thule Subterra 34L carries 6L more than the Cotopaxi Allpa 28 (28L vs. 34L), while the Cotopaxi Allpa 28 is the lighter pack at 1kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Cotopaxi Allpa 28 fits 73% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Thule Subterra 34L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Allpa 28 is the better call.