The North Face Router vs. Jansport Far Out 65

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

The North Face Router

Front facing view of the The North Face Router
Capacity40 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×35.6×26.7 cm
Airline fit3%
Price$149

Feature by feature

The North Face RouterFeatureJansport Far Out 65
Storage
N Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
500D Nylon Oxford Slub, 420 D Nylon, 210D Cordura® Nylon Ripstop700 Denier Recycled Ripstop Poly

Jansport Far Out 65

Front facing view of the Jansport Far Out 65
Capacity65 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions68×33×19 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$120

Key differences between the The North Face Router and Jansport Far Out 65

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. 4 accept only the The North Face Router, and 0 accept only the Jansport Far Out 65.

Only the The North Face Router fits

Adria Airways, Air New Zealand, Island Air, Sun Country.

The North Face Router vs. Jansport Far Out 65: which should you pack?

The Jansport Far Out 65 carries 25L more than the The North Face Router (40L vs. 65L), while the The North Face Router is the lighter pack at 1.5kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the The North Face Router fits 3% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Jansport Far Out 65; if you want to travel lighter, the The North Face Router is the better call.