The North Face Router vs. Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

The North Face Router

Front facing view of the The North Face Router
Capacity40 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×35.6×26.7 cm
Airline fit3%
Price$149

Feature by feature

The North Face RouterFeatureOsprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
500D Nylon Oxford Slub, 420 D Nylon, 210D Cordura® Nylon Ripstop400D Nylon TPU Double Coated

Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack

Front facing view of the Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack
Capacity30 L
Weight1 kg
Dimensions52×36×29 cm
Airline fit2%
Price$130

Key differences between the The North Face Router and Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 4 accept both. 2 accept only the The North Face Router, and 0 accept only the Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack.

Only the The North Face Router fits

Island Air, Sun Country.

The North Face Router vs. Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack: which should you pack?

The The North Face Router carries 10L more than the Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack (40L vs. 30L), while the Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack is the lighter pack at 1kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the The North Face Router fits 3% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the The North Face Router; if you want to travel lighter, the Osprey Transporter® Zip Top Pack is the better call.