ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. Aer City Pack Pro 2

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada

Front facing view of the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada
Capacity22 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×28×13 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$350

Feature by feature

ULA Equipment Ultra CicadaFeatureAer City Pack Pro 2
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport top, side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
optional Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 16in
4 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side, internal Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
ULTRA 400TX1680D CORDURA® ballistic nylon

Aer City Pack Pro 2

by Aer
Front facing view of the Aer City Pack Pro 2
Capacity24 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions46×32×18 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$210

Key differences between the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada and Aer City Pack Pro 2

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 177 accept both. 2 accept only the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada, and 0 accept only the Aer City Pack Pro 2.

Only the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. Aer City Pack Pro 2: which should you pack?

The Aer City Pack Pro 2 carries 2L more than the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada (22L vs. 24L), while the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Aer City Pack Pro 2; if you want to travel lighter, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the better call.