ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. Aer City Pack X-Pac

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada

Front facing view of the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada
Capacity22 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×28×13 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$350

Feature by feature

ULA Equipment Ultra CicadaFeatureAer City Pack X-Pac
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
optional Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 16in
4 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side, internal Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
ULTRA 400TXVX-42 X-Pac

Aer City Pack X-Pac

by Aer
Front facing view of the Aer City Pack X-Pac
Capacity14 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions46×30×12 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$180

Key differences between the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada and Aer City Pack X-Pac

Both have: passport pocket, luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 178 accept both. 1 accept only the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada, and 0 accept only the Aer City Pack X-Pac.

Only the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. Aer City Pack X-Pac: which should you pack?

The ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada carries 8L more than the Aer City Pack X-Pac (22L vs. 14L), while the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada; if you want to travel lighter, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the better call.