ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. Aer City Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada

Front facing view of the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada
Capacity22 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×28×13 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$350

Feature by feature

ULA Equipment Ultra CicadaFeatureAer City Pack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
optional Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 16in
4 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side, internal Water Bottle Holder 1, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
ULTRA 400TX1680D Cordura® ballistic nylon exterior

Aer City Pack

by Aer
Front facing view of the Aer City Pack
Capacity14 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions46×30×13 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Key differences between the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada and Aer City Pack

Both have: passport pocket, luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 178 accept both. 1 accept only the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada, and 0 accept only the Aer City Pack.

Only the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. Aer City Pack: which should you pack?

The ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada carries 8L more than the Aer City Pack (22L vs. 14L), while the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada; if you want to travel lighter, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the better call.