ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. 5.11 Rush 12 2.0

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada

Front facing view of the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada
Capacity22 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×28×13 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$350

Feature by feature

ULA Equipment Ultra CicadaFeature5.11 Rush 12 2.0
Storage
N Compression 2
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport front, side
Y Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
optional Hip Belt optional
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 6
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side, internal Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
ULTRA 400TX1050D nylon (MultiCam® 1000D nylon)

5.11 Rush 12 2.0

by 5.11
Front facing view of the 5.11 Rush 12 2.0
Capacity24 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions46×28×17 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$110

Key differences between the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada and 5.11 Rush 12 2.0

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada vs. 5.11 Rush 12 2.0: which should you pack?

The 5.11 Rush 12 2.0 carries 2L more than the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada (22L vs. 24L), while the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the 5.11 Rush 12 2.0; if you want to travel lighter, the ULA Equipment Ultra Cicada is the better call.