Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking vs. Osprey Manta 34

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking

Front facing view of the Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking
Capacity60 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions65×35×35 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$170

Feature by feature

Simond MT500 Air 50+10L BackpackingFeatureOsprey Manta 34
Storage
>5 Compression 4
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 1
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
4 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly Y
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
210D Rip stop nylonbluesign® APPROVED 100% recycled 210D high-tenacity honey comb contrast nylon, DWR treatments made without PFAS

Osprey Manta 34

Front facing view of the Osprey Manta 34
Capacity34 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions62×35×28 cm
Airline fit2%
Price$220

Key differences between the Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking and Osprey Manta 34

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. 0 accept only the Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking, and 2 accept only the Osprey Manta 34.

Only the Osprey Manta 34 fits

Island Air, Virgin America.

Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking vs. Osprey Manta 34: which should you pack?

The Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking carries 26L more than the Osprey Manta 34 (60L vs. 34L), while the Osprey Manta 34 is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Osprey Manta 34 fits 2% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Simond MT500 Air 50+10L Backpacking; if you want to travel lighter, the Osprey Manta 34 is the better call.