Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions48×31×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$129

Feature by feature

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25LFeatureArc'teryx Blade 28
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport back
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% recycled polyesterN210p-HT nylon 6,6 N630p-HT nylon 6,6

Arc'teryx Blade 28

Front facing view of the Arc'teryx Blade 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×31×16 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$160

Key differences between the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L and Arc'teryx Blade 28

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 8 accept only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L, and 0 accept only the Arc'teryx Blade 28.

Only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28: which should you pack?

The Arc'teryx Blade 28 carries 3L more than the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L (25L vs. 28L), while the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arc'teryx Blade 28; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the better call.