Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions48×31×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$129

Feature by feature

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25LFeaturePatagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 1, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester8.7-oz 300-denier

Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L

Capacity30 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions51×30×18 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$200

Key differences between the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L and Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 5 accept only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L, and 0 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L.

Only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L carries 5L more than the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L (25L vs. 30L), while the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Black Hole Mini MLC 30L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the better call.