Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions48×31×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$129

Feature by feature

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25LFeatureTimbuk2 Scheme
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 6
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester

Timbuk2 Scheme

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme
Capacity21 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions43×30×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$180

Key differences between the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L and Timbuk2 Scheme

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L, and 6 accept only the Timbuk2 Scheme.

Only the Timbuk2 Scheme fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Timbuk2 Scheme: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L carries 4L more than the Timbuk2 Scheme (25L vs. 21L), while the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Timbuk2 Scheme fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the better call.