Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions48×31×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$129

Feature by feature

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25LFeaturePatagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport N
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 2
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester8.7-oz 300-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop with a postindustrial recycled TPU-film laminate

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Capacity22 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Key differences between the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L and Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L, and 4 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L.

Only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska.

Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L vs. Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L carries 3L more than the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L (25L vs. 22L), while the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Tres Backpack 25L is the better call.