Osprey Farpoint 55 vs. Thule Landmark
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Osprey Farpoint 55
| Capacity | 55 L |
| Weight | 1.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 55×35×25 cm |
| Airline fit | 38% |
| Price | $220 |
Feature by feature
| Osprey Farpoint 55 | Feature | Thule Landmark |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | 4 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| hideable | Hip Belt | hideable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | 16in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 1, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| bluesign® APPROVED 450D recycled twist dobby polyester, PFAS-free DWR | 420D Dobby polyester, bluesign approved |
Key differences between the Osprey Farpoint 55 and Thule Landmark
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Osprey Farpoint 55; 1, side on the Thule Landmark.
Both have: compression straps, passport pocket, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 71 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Farpoint 55, and 1 accept only the Thule Landmark.
Only the Thule Landmark fits
Caribbean Airlines.
Osprey Farpoint 55 vs. Thule Landmark: which should you pack?
The Osprey Farpoint 55 carries 15L more than the Thule Landmark (55L vs. 40L), while the Thule Landmark is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Osprey Farpoint 55 fits 38% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Farpoint 55; if you want to travel lighter, the Thule Landmark is the better call.