Zpacks Bagger Ultra vs. Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Zpacks Bagger Ultra

Front facing view of the Zpacks Bagger Ultra
Capacity25 L
Weight0.3 kg
Dimensions46×28×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$250

Feature by feature

Zpacks Bagger UltraFeaturePakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable, optional Hip Belt removable, optional
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
3.3oz/sqyd Ultra 100X, not coated with DWR or other chemicals and is PFAS free70D x 160D recycled nylon Tasland ripstop fabric PFAS-free durable water resistant coating

Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L

by Pakt
Front facing view of the Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L
Capacity16 L
Weight0.4 kg
Dimensions43×26×12 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$95

Key differences between the Zpacks Bagger Ultra and Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. 0 accept only the Zpacks Bagger Ultra, and 2 accept only the Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L.

Only the Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L fits

Air Tahiti, Gulf Air.

Zpacks Bagger Ultra vs. Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L: which should you pack?

The Zpacks Bagger Ultra carries 9L more than the Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L (25L vs. 16L), while the Zpacks Bagger Ultra is the lighter pack at 0.3kg (vs. 0.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Pakt Stash Packable Backpack 16L fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Zpacks Bagger Ultra; if you want to travel lighter, the Zpacks Bagger Ultra is the better call.