Trakke Stor vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Trakke Stor

Front facing view of the Trakke Stor
Capacity30 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions49×34×19 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$350

Feature by feature

Trakke StorFeatureArc'teryx Blade 28
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
front Passport back
N Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Waxed canvasN210p-HT nylon 6,6 N630p-HT nylon 6,6

Arc'teryx Blade 28

Front facing view of the Arc'teryx Blade 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×31×16 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$160

Key differences between the Trakke Stor and Arc'teryx Blade 28

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 6 accept only the Trakke Stor, and 0 accept only the Arc'teryx Blade 28.

Only the Trakke Stor fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian, WestJet.

Trakke Stor vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28: which should you pack?

The Trakke Stor carries 2L more than the Arc'teryx Blade 28 (30L vs. 28L), while the Trakke Stor is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Trakke Stor fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Trakke Stor; if you want to travel lighter, the Trakke Stor is the better call.