Timbuk2 Parkside vs. Cotopaxi Tasra 16L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Timbuk2 Parkside

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Parkside
Capacity25 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$70

Feature by feature

Timbuk2 ParksideFeatureCotopaxi Tasra 16L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
front Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 13in
4 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2, side
N Water Resistant N
Material
100% recycled polyester

Cotopaxi Tasra 16L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L
Capacity16 L
Weight0.5 kg
Dimensions43×27×14 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$85

Key differences between the Timbuk2 Parkside and Cotopaxi Tasra 16L

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, built-in organizer.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 178 accept both. 0 accept only the Timbuk2 Parkside, and 3 accept only the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L.

Only the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L fits

Air Tahiti, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air.

Timbuk2 Parkside vs. Cotopaxi Tasra 16L: which should you pack?

The Timbuk2 Parkside carries 9L more than the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L (25L vs. 16L), while the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L is the lighter pack at 0.5kg (vs. 0.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Timbuk2 Parkside; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L is the better call.