Arcido Faroe vs. Millican Smith 25L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Faroe

Front facing view of the Arcido Faroe
Capacity35 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions55×35×20 cm
Airline fit86%
Price$215

Feature by feature

Arcido FaroeFeatureMillican Smith 25L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 2
back Passport side
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Body Fabric: 500D Blendex Kodra - With PU coating Bottom Scuff Fabric: 1000D Codra - With PU coating Lining: 150D Premium Polyester OxfordWeatherproof Bionic Canvas

Millican Smith 25L

Front facing view of the Millican Smith 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions52×28×18 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$145

Key differences between the Arcido Faroe and Millican Smith 25L

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 162 accept both. 0 accept only the Arcido Faroe, and 6 accept only the Millican Smith 25L.

Only the Millican Smith 25L fits

Cayman Airways, Great Lakes Airlines, Liat Airlines, Scoot, Tiger Airways, WestJet.

Arcido Faroe vs. Millican Smith 25L: which should you pack?

The Arcido Faroe carries 10L more than the Millican Smith 25L (35L vs. 25L), while the Arcido Faroe is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Millican Smith 25L fits 89% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Faroe; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Faroe is the better call.