Exped Core 25 vs. Fjallraven Vardag 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Core 25

Front facing view of the Exped Core 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions54×27×20 cm
Airline fit88%

Feature by feature

Exped Core 25FeatureFjallraven Vardag 25
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1680 D Ballistic nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water columnG-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton

Fjallraven Vardag 25

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Vardag 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.48 kg
Dimensions43×31×14.5 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$80

Key differences between the Exped Core 25 and Fjallraven Vardag 25

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 1 accept only the Exped Core 25, and 13 accept only the Fjallraven Vardag 25.

Only the Exped Core 25 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Fjallraven Vardag 25 fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Exped Core 25 vs. Fjallraven Vardag 25: which should you pack?

The Exped Core 25 carries the same capacity as the Fjallraven Vardag 25 (25L vs. 25L), while the Exped Core 25 is the lighter pack at 0.1kg (vs. 0.48kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Vardag 25 fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Core 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Core 25 is the better call.