Exped Core 25 vs. Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Core 25

Front facing view of the Exped Core 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions54×27×20 cm
Airline fit88%

Feature by feature

Exped Core 25FeatureNomatic McKinnon Cube Pack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1680 D Ballistic nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water columnNylon

Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack

Front facing view of the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack
Capacity21 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions45×34×19 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$125

Key differences between the Exped Core 25 and Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 1 accept only the Exped Core 25, and 13 accept only the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack.

Only the Exped Core 25 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Exped Core 25 vs. Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack: which should you pack?

The Exped Core 25 carries 4L more than the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack (25L vs. 21L), while the Exped Core 25 is the lighter pack at 0.1kg (vs. 0.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Nomatic McKinnon Cube Pack fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Core 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Core 25 is the better call.