Exped Core 25 vs. Photo Sport BP 200 AW II

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Core 25

Front facing view of the Exped Core 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions54×27×20 cm
Airline fit88%

Feature by feature

Exped Core 25FeaturePhoto Sport BP 200 AW II
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly Y
N Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1680 D Ballistic nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water columnN100 nylon with UTS coating, N210D HD Oxford nylon, stretch polyester

Photo Sport BP 200 AW II

Front facing view of the Photo Sport BP 200 AW II
Capacity25 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions52×24.5×20 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$150

Key differences between the Exped Core 25 and Photo Sport BP 200 AW II

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 0 accept only the Exped Core 25, and 1 accept only the Photo Sport BP 200 AW II.

Only the Photo Sport BP 200 AW II fits

WestJet.

Exped Core 25 vs. Photo Sport BP 200 AW II: which should you pack?

The Exped Core 25 carries the same capacity as the Photo Sport BP 200 AW II (25L vs. 25L), while the Exped Core 25 is the lighter pack at 0.1kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Photo Sport BP 200 AW II fits 89% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Core 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Core 25 is the better call.